Greeley Mayor Tom Norton announced his bid for reelection this week, and stated his goals as economic development, infrastructure repair and replacement, and water expansion. However, since being elected in 2009 Norton has been ineffective in each of these arenas. Norton touted his experience at the state level, as chief of the Department of Transportation, and as a state Senator.
So let's look at what Norton has done.
- Norton served as Department of Transportation chief for eight years. However, this area is filled with dirty business dealings, kickbacks, and inside deals. Recently Norton proposed spending $625 thousand dollars...to repave the parking lot at city hall! If that is what experience brings to the table, Norton is more of a danger than an asset.
- Norton was elected Greeley Mayor in 2009, and stated he would look at what needed to be done to repeal regulations, taxes and fees that hindered small business growth in the city. When asked recently at the Greeley 9.12 meeting what he had done in this area in the past 2 years, he was forced to respond to the fact that he had done...nothing. If he plans to build on his past, he will probably continue to do nothing in this area in the future.
- Greeley Report recently exposed the internal corruption that is ongoing in the city Water and Sewer segment, revealing possible lawbreaking and fraud committed by the City Manager Roy Otto and Water and Sewer Director Jon Monson. What steps has Norton taken to deal with this? None. Absolutely none. In short, Norton has a track record of doing nothing in the three areas he wants to address in his next term as mayor. And he ignores potential fraud within the city administration.
Prior to becoming Mayor, Tom Norton was one of the leading powers trying to push through an unnecessary bond issue that would have generated $16 million for District 6 Schools. Voters shot it down. He's out of touch with the people he wants to lead. Norton is married to UNC President Kay Norton that is pro-illegal-aliens receiving in-state tuition at UNC.
Norton also likes to play up his role as Mayor whenever it's to his advantage. However, when challenged with tough issues, he hides behind the fact that he is one vote on the city council. In short, he is an experienced politician, and a long-time bureaucrat that knows how to work with state and federal issues. But is he the best candidate to run the city? Probably not.
So, who will run against him? The local demoncrats will probably put up a liberal, socially-conscious candidate of some type, but it is up to the conservatives and independents to present a candidate that can really lead the city. Norton has not messed things up very badly, but he hasn't moved the city forward either. That's not a ringing endorsement that deserves another term.
