The tragedy in Norway caused by a lone gunman has made news around the world. Known as a law-abiding people and the home of the Nobel Peace Prize, Norway prides itself on it's love for peace, pragmatism and quiet living. That idyllic calm was shattered over the weekend by a madman that killed more than 90 people.
What do we know about the gunman so far? First, he was a loner that shocked even his neighbors with his actions. Despite allegations to the contrary, he was not a "Christian," supporting darwinian evolution and neo-nazi views instead. In his manifesto comprised of more than 1,500 pages, the gunman ranted against multiculturalism, muslims, and the elimination of European culture. He extracted lengthy portions of his diatribe from the left-leaning unibomber's manifesto (Ted Kackynski), and he expressed his admiration for Barack Obama.
While the attention was focused on this singular event, Muslim terrorists struck in Mumbai, India yet again. They also hanged an 8-year old boy in Afghanistan, killed others in Nigeria and Somalia and destroyed more than twice the number of lives as this lone gunman. Islam does this every week. Have you become immunized to the horrors of their practices? The media has turned a blind eye to their operations, choosing instead to focus on the lone gunman. While it is true the attack in Norway was heinous, especially given the culture he shattered, it pales in comparison to the consistent, relentless, murders perpetrated by the so-called religion of peace. We mourn Norway's losses. And we will continue to stand against the ongoing Muslim terror threats. They are greater than the work of any lone gunman. Any effort to move our attention elsewhere would be a trap.
Bobby J,
Other than describing communism and asking why liberals would vote for it..., what's yer point?
It's socialism that the liberals are seeking.
Posted by: Dennis | July 28, 2011 at 06:48 PM
Here are some quotations from ABB's "Manifesto" that shed additional light on his political philosophy:
" (We should) decrease global consummation through implementing protectionist policies. The future cultural conservative European Federation (Europe w/Russia, US, Canada, Australia, NZ will introduce significantly higher import taxes which will significantly give European producers the profitability they need to re-build their industries and to remain economically
sustainable."
"All globalist companies will be nationalised (a minimum of 50,1% ownership must be redistributed
to EF governments hands (combined) at any given time, for their respective countries). Investors with majority control who refuse this re nationalisation process will have their respective corporation expelled from the European Federation monetary zone".
"Phase out diesel/benzin vehicles (and thus end our dependency on Muslim oil) and focus on
commercialising electric cars/battery cells. This will be a lot more significant problem in the
US due to their decentralised infrastructure but much easier in Europe."
"Studies have indicated that as a conflict progresses and develops (civil war etc) and the masses flock to gold this development contributes to a downturn in national economies."
"Great Britain and Scandinavia, which left the gold standard in 1931, recovered much earlier than France and Belgium, which remained on gold much longer. Countries such as China, which had a silver standard, almost avoided the depression entirely. The connection between leaving the gold standard as a strong predictor of that country's severity of its depression and the length of time of its recovery has been shown to be consistent for dozens of countries, including developing countries."
"...a welfare state will work perfectly well intertwined with capitalistic doctrines as long as the country is monocultural/the social cohesion level is at an acceptable level. A welfare state would never work in the US due to the lack of social cohesion, because they have large minority groups who are allowed parallel cultures, norms and ethics."
"Blindly opposing welfare is an American neo-Con doctrine and has nothing to do with nationalism. There are certain aspects of modern civilisation and common decency which require degrees of state welfare. It is the way it is legislated and managed which is crucial."
"...the US model is an extreme variant, almost resembling a pure laissez faire model. 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are now in the hands of 1 percent of the people. 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans. The top 10 percent of Americans
now earn around 50 percent of the national income"
"While capitalistic principles should be protected, it should be somewhat regulated so that it benefits other members of the tribe (Scandinavian light model)."
In a word, how the guy who favors protectionism, nationalization of all corporations, welfare state, paper money and central banking, "environmental" government spending and attacks the American laissez-faire could have anything to do with the ideas of Mises Institute, or for that matter, any libertarian or classical liberal organization?
Posted by: Bobby J. | July 27, 2011 at 08:25 AM
You sure are gullible, Greeleygirl. I should advertise on the station you listen to.
Posted by: Shirley | July 26, 2011 at 12:05 PM
Heard on the radio tonight that Obama, speaking to LA RAZA, said he just might give amnesty to twenty MILLION aliens himself. Who died and left him King?
Posted by: greeleygirl | July 25, 2011 at 09:53 PM
Near as I can tell this guy did not kill in Jesus' name (now that would be an oxymoron, wouldn't it?).
I expect the media to exploit ANY opportunity to portray "radical Christians" as terrorists. I do suppose it's possible, but Sam is right. Muslims murder and terrorize EVERY day, in the name of their god.
My thoughts and prayers go out to those who lost loved ones, in this heinous, unconscionable attack.
Part of the catalyst of revolution in the USA will be staged acts of terrorism by "radical Christians", by the left, after violence spills over into the USA from Mexico. The basis will be economic, combined with severely compromising our 2nd Amendment.
Posted by: Dennis | July 25, 2011 at 08:36 PM
Sam, are you the ultimate judge as to who is Christian and who is Muslim? If they are terrorists, they cannot be a true Christian and a Muslim? If the terrorist is a self-proclaimed Christian, who has "received Jesus as his personal savior," then what is he?
Posted by: Shirley | July 25, 2011 at 12:25 PM