The relaxing of FAA regulations to enable drones unfettered access to the nation's skies opens a pandora's box of privacy and property right concerns. Drones can be anywhere, used for nearly anything (as this CBS News report from Grand Junction describes), and can also be bought by anyone.
To further investigate this, Sam Hill checked into the possibility of buying a drone himself. He wanted a camera drone that would record activities on camera, taking still shots and even video. He had to look no further than Amazon's website. Drones were available there, controlled by an iPod, and could be used to record virtually anything on the ground. Do-It-Yourself Drones (link here to their site) is doing a booming business in this area as well, and can show you how to "observe" anything you want using a drone.
It may be argued that the concern over drones in the hands of governmental authorities is no cause for concern, that they need probable cause in order to use one in a case. However, we may soon see that change. With thousands of pages of new regulations enacted each year you (and I) are undoubtedly breaking some kind of a law right now. If the government has an agenda, all they need to do is say they had a probable cause, launch a drone, and find the infraction.
It's true that drones have excellent uses. But they are also dangerous, because the government has overstepped the Constitution and the law with impunity. It is up to citizens to push government back. As Ronald Reagan famously stated, "the government is not the solution, it is the problem." We need to remember that, because the eyes in the skies may be looking at us.

Some of these new drones are disguised as a small maple seeds and weigh in less then an ounce. These are designed to look like ordinary tree refuse and land on your window sill and record all your conversations and actions within your home. You will never know they are there.
Posted by: Tyrant Fighter | February 28, 2012 at 06:33 AM
Powerball,
You got me all flustered. None of the actions I suggested are illegal or disobedient. They are revolutionary loopholes that are firmly planted in our Bill of Rights and United States Constitution. Petition your government for less government, NOW!
You on the other hand, you are suggesting that airplane be shot down. Even the mere utterance is illegal. How easy is that to prove? These days what the hell does proof have to do with it? Everything they need, you typed right here at Greeley Report. Thoughts and words are very much illegal. What fantasy land have you been hiding in? And now with NDAA, you won’t even get a trial.
Larger point is this; none of you sissies will ever take a shot at any drone. Rather than take real actions you sit around here and talk chit.
Posted by: Bobby J. | February 21, 2012 at 09:31 AM
Pull! Sad part is, they fly way to high. You will never ever no till your sunbathed butt is on you tube or you wake up dead.
http://lewrockwell.com/orig11/lendman12.1.html
Posted by: Bobby J. | February 21, 2012 at 08:28 AM
I was talking about revolution. Revolution sanctioned by our Constitution, as this government has become destructive.
I will wait until after the 2012 general election. There may still be a slim chance that we can turn this mess around; however, I doubt it and I am planning accordingly.
If our government launches drones to spy on us, then I will do everything in my power to eliminate them. I am not afraid of the consequences, as I am an American patriot. It's as simple as that. Somebody has got to make a stand, some where along this shameful and ingratiating denigration of our once great nation.
America R.I.P.
Posted by: Dennis | February 20, 2012 at 08:27 PM
Civil disobedience is not the same as conspiracy to commit a Federal crime.
No, they're different. Civil disobedience is an action. Actions are punishable.
Conspiracies are thoughts.
Which one is more provable?
Posted by: Powerball | February 20, 2012 at 07:00 PM
I figured you may try to call me on that. No point in doing/saying things that will remove you from the political arena. Time and time again ATF and other Federalies have beaten people to pieces for even suggesting these types of things. Thats fact I can prove.
The items I suggested will not get you in automatic trouble and are likely to wear them down if enough were to do it.
Civil disobedience is not the same as conspiracy to commit a Federal crime.
THINK!
Posted by: Bobby J. | February 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM
Ahum.
"You are rationalizing your fear. Who cares if you are on a list, it is called civil disobedience and I am honored to be on the “list”. There are at least 100,000 like me on the list."
In times of revolution, what constitutes civil disobedience and at what point is one ready to cross that line?
When bullets are flying?
Posted by: Powerball | February 18, 2012 at 04:47 PM
Who said I was joking?
Posted by: Dennis | February 18, 2012 at 03:45 PM
Dennis,
I have a sense of humor, the jack booted thugs do not.
Posted by: Bobby J. | February 18, 2012 at 09:26 AM
Sorry Powerball, I meant that for you. You know, the one with a sense of humor?
Posted by: Dennis | February 18, 2012 at 05:13 AM
Bobby J thats funny?
I said nothing.
I do not advocate shooting guns in the air unless during hunting season with license.
Not funny. I dont joke about guns or shooting airplanes.
Posted by: Bobby J. | February 17, 2012 at 09:20 PM
Bobby J,
That's funny! I wish I was there in one of those trees.
Seriously though; we could set up a point system, like how many shots it would take to bring a drone down. Kinda like scoring for golf.
I can't wait!
Posted by: Dennis | February 17, 2012 at 08:26 PM
Oh, BTW.
Pat Buchanan,
HOW does it feel
To be all alone
On your own
Like a rolling stone.
Posted by: Powerball | February 17, 2012 at 07:06 PM
Animal rights group says drone shot down
http://thetandd.com/animal-rights-group-says-drone-shot-down/article_017a720a-56ce-11e1-afc4-001871e3ce6c.html
Oh well, back to the drawing board.
LOL
Posted by: Powerball | February 17, 2012 at 07:02 PM
Can you spot a drone in the sky? Cause I'm thinking of a fun new sport.
Posted by: Dennis | February 17, 2012 at 04:21 PM