Blog powered by Typepad

Newsvine Politics News

« You Can't Have It Both Ways | Main | Romney Snubs Weld, Santorum Visits »

February 03, 2012



I'm sorry you can't read basic English, Bobby. The case couldn't be more clear. It's a simple issue: Did the Court in Minor make any decision, ruling, holding, etc. with regard to the issue that applies to Pres. Obama, i.e., whether someone born in the U.S. to one or two non-citizen parents is himself a U.S. citizen? The court did not. Resolution of this issue does not require deference to any person with a robe or law degree. It simply requires the ability to read an understand the Court's opinion. Please try to persuade me otherwise.

Bobby J.

Geesh Shirley,

In your world if it comes from a black robe and or has a law degree, then it must be gospel.

Lazy? Drinking educrat koolaid is lazy.


Did you read the case? Time to admit you're wrong. Or stupid. Snopes is not my source. I'm not that lazy.

Bobby J.

Geesh Shirley, Snopes is not Gospel.


The Conn SSN issue is a hoax.

Read the Minor case. Anyone literate can recognize the Court specifically did not indicate whether one born in the US to non-citizen parents was a citizen. "Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts."

Bobby J.


You gave a NON answer. I have read the case and listened to interviews with those directly involved in case.

Let me ask again, why the 1977 CT SS #?


On a side note:

The use of the Social Security number (SSN) has expanded significantly since its inception in 1936. Created merely to keep track of the earnings history of U.S. workers for Social Security entitlement and benefit computation purposes, it has come to be used as a nearly universal identifier.

What does that say about obamacare? You know they will be able to access your bank account, which means that the U.S. will just take what they want from you, rather than go to the expense of reconciling your income to tax law.


By Snopes:

Prior to 1973, cards were issued in local SSA offices around the country and the Area (1st three digits)number represented the office code in which the SSN was issued.

Now Snopes (a known liberal bias) disagrees, adamantly, that obama's SSN is illegitimate, yet in the body of their own "proof" they admit that SSN's were assigned by locality. So why does BHO have a Connecticut SSN? When he was born in Hawaii?

MSM sways simple minds. Minds that are easily lead astray.



So nobody will read the case? You have no trouble typing (or in the case of one of you, cutting and pasting), but are you unable to read?

Bobby J.

I just want to know why, the S.S. # Obama uses was issued at Connecticut in the year 1977, although Obama has no proof that he ever resided or conducted business there.


Why aren't you marching on Washington? I know you hate Obama, but the problems and legislation of which you rightfully complain were in place before Obama. He is neither unique nor profound in his preference for government heavy-handedness.


What you wrote is truely a mouthful!
"Maybe your lives are miserable for reasons other than Obama and insane conspiracies. Maybe it's your fault."
But Zeke, all I have to do is question Google, find the article that represents what I'm looking for and remain blind to the real source of my problem.

"I won't vote for him, but with improving economic indicators, Obama will be tough to beat."
And for that I will ignor the corruption. Isn't that what always happens?

No one said a word when in 1999 Clinton and many Republicans suspended Glass-Seatgall. It and the Community Reinvestment Act created the housing bubble.
It's easier to blame government than to be responsible for what your government does.
A completely entitlement minded society.

What is the difference between TARP and the FDIC?
The FDIC is a government insurance insuring that your deposit will be there for you should you need it.
TARP it's said will cost every man, woman, and child upwards of $40,000.
What child had $40,000 in the bank?
In otherewords, the difference between what you actually had in the bank and the cost to you for TARP, the bank bailout, is how much over speculation was done. Now multiply that by 300 million Americans.
Our "leaders" didn't even have that much money! So what they did was borrow it with interest in your name.
Now ask yourself this; how much did your FDIC deposit insurance cost you over the years??

I cannot understand why every American isn't marching on Washington. Instead the polls say the majority of us are worried about the economy. LOL
Don't forget the bill, with interest, you will be paying for TARP. At least they could have just drained our bank accounts and called it even!
It's amazing! Some 345 people pulled this scam on 300 million other people.
Yep, it wasn't a conspiracy at all. Conspiracies are hidden. This has all been done in daylight, while you had your a$$ to the grind and all you'd need to do to change it is to standup to 345 scumbaggs!


Besure to check out:

Controversial Artist Depicts Obama Trampling The Constitution

How exactly right!!


Maybe your lives are miserable for reasons other than Obama and insane conspiracies. Maybe it's your fault. I won't vote for him, but with improving economic indicators, Obama will be tough to beat.


But when his own mother cannot write his fathers name on his birth notice, what is he really?
Something like a mule maybe.
What ever "it" is, "it's" alien.

What I would like to know is how separation of church and state is suppose to work.
If a church can lose its tax exempt status for endorsing or not a candidate or government policy from the pulpit how is it that Obamanation can interpret tax policies Jesus might have held?

In fact Jesus said to tithe ten percent. Not 35% or more.

I will tell you one thing. I never expected to see in my lifetime such a guttural slime in the White House.
He is truely an abomination of a man, father, husband, leader or president.
Enjoy these last few months before the election because if this curse is reelected you will never be a free person again. You will spend the remainder of your days looking over your shoulder, skeptical of every person you see.
God, I hate the man!


.....come to think of it, that obama is a real rat-fink


Could it be that the good ole USA is purposely arming a particular drug cartel in Mexico? Could this same activity be jeopardizing our 2nd Amendment rights? Could this be by design?

Sinaloa cartel.

It is argued that the Bush administration started the "Fast & Furious" program. They may well have, but the difference is under Bush it was done with the consent of the Mexican government. Under the obama administration thousands of guns "walked", with NO consent from the Mexican government. Now why would they do that? Could it be that the illicit drug industry is "to big to fail"? Could it be that the doping of America serves some nefarious purpose?.......and, if while we're at it we could attack the 2nd Amendment, WOW!

nah...., that's just some kind of conspiracy theory

the dots are all there, it's up to you to connect them


The first sentence of the second paragraph is a lie. Read the case.


“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President...."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

The comments to this entry are closed.